英文摘要 |
Under the impact of neo-liberalism and global capital flows, as well as the rapid social changes and the flourishing of individualism, the traditional tribal cultures of the indigenous peoples in Taiwan have become increasingly emptied out, and the tribal collective support systems have gradually declined. In view of this, the Council of Indigenous Peoples started the Indigenous Tribe Vitality Program in 2012, hoping to unite the strength of the tribal members through mutual assistance, co-eating, sharing, and co-production to maintain the stability of tribal survival. The Indigenous tribal vitality program is implemented through tribal meetings to form consensus and complete its public affairs participation. In addition, in order to truly understand the implementation of the vitality program of each tribe and the effectiveness of the promotion of the program, the administrative part of the promotion program requires a mid-term visit and a final local evaluation meeting. Experts, scholars, and administrators make up the members of the mid-term visit and the local evaluation meeting at the end of the period. They are also used to screen the tribes that can be continuously funded in the next year and that can serve as models for the guidance and development of the vital tribes in the future. The mid-term visit and final evaluation mechanism is to guide and identify the foundation and structure of tribal activation and the vision of sustainable management. This article takes the final evaluation meetings of the Indigenous Tribes Vitality Program as the field for observation and proposes a different research approach from the existing human-centered perspective of the meeting. It observes, describes, and discusses the ''parliament of things'' composed of the agentive perspectives of objects, the environment, places, bodies, and materials, as well as their revealed trajectories, and their relationship with other entities. Through the speaking and self-narration of things, researchers will be able to detect and identify all kinds of things and their dynamic generation in the evaluation meeting, as well as understand how they penetrate the evaluation meetings, affecting the form, boundaries and connotations of the meetings. |