從關係性論述探究轉型正義中的原住民族傳統領域議題

On Traditional Territory of Indigenous Peoples in the Process of Transitional Justice: An Inquiry from the Perspective of “Relational” Discourse

本文旨在探討原住民族轉型正義中的傳統領域議題，我們透過分析轉型正義與傳統領域這兩個運動中常見的詞彙，探討這兩個運動修辭中的複雜意涵，並嘗試導入「關係性」視角進行收束。在轉型正義的分析上，將轉型正義拆解為轉型與正義，探究轉型正義定義層次的轉變，尋找原住民族轉型正義的論述空間，並從敘事的自我此一視角，強調「關係性」的轉型正義。接著，在傳統領域的分析中，本文亦針對傳統與領域兩個概念進行重構，借用歷史實踐及議題抗爭評論者對領域內涵的考察，強調傳統領域不僅是固著的絕對空間，而是與人們的行動密切相關，是具有關係性的空間維度。本文認為，轉型正義與傳統領域並非彼此平行，而是在這兩個概念中皆內蘊的關係性維度而有所交集。

This paper aims to investigate the issue of indigenous traditional territory under the umbrella of transitional justice. The authors analyze two vocabularies appearing frequently in the indigenous social movement, transitional justice and traditional territory, to explore their complex meaning and to introduce “relational” perspectives for the closing remarks. Transitional justice is broken down into “transition” and “justice” to clarify the definitional change of the transitional justice in order to enlarge the discursive dimension of indigenous transitional justice, and to emphasize what we proposed “relational” transitional justice from the perspective of Alasdair MacIntyre’s “narrative self ”. In the analysis of traditional territory, this paper intends to re-interpret the two concepts of both tradition and territory by using James Clifford’s historical practice and David Harvey’s relational spacetime thinking. Traditional territory is not only a fixed and absolute space but also possessed of relational positioning. We argue that traditional justice and traditional territory is not separate and parallel to each other, but instead a mutual supplement concept because of their embedded relational dimension.