對監督權的再監督

在“一府一委兩院”憲制架構的基礎上，貫徹落實地方監察委員會對同級人大負責的憲法規定，建構符合地方人大屬性的監督模式，是推進法治反腐全面深化，實現“對監督權的再監督”的必要保障。從本質上看，地方人大對“權”的監督與地方監察委員會對“人”的監督之間並不存在衝突，兩者具有互補性。將地方人大對地方監察委員會的監督納入整個法治監督體系之中，有助於解決地方監察委員會作為“監督者難以監督自身”的問題，克服扁平化監察監督權的“內在貧困性”。要改變地方人大監督“柔性有餘而剛性不足”的狀況，就必須將剛性監督工作提至幕前，通過充分發揮其全過程性監督職能以及重啟剛性問責監督職能，保障再監督的實效性。

On the basis of the constitutional structure of ''the Government, the Supervision Committee, the Court and the Procuratorate'', to implement the constitutional stipulation that the local supervisory committee members should be responsible to the people’s congress at the same level, and to construct a supervisory model which conforms to the attributes of local people’s congress, constitute an necessary guarantee to promoting the rule of law, comprehensively deepening anti-corrupting and realizing the ''re-supervision of supervisory power''. In essence, there is no conflict between the supervision of ''power'' by local people’s congress and that of ''person'' by local supervisory committee, and actually these two aspects are complementary. The incorporation of local people’s congress supervision over local supervisory committee into the whole supervisory system will help overcome the drawbacks of local supervisory committee as ''supervisors are difficult to supervise themselves'' and make up for the ''inherent poverty'' of supervisory power. In order to change the situation that the local people’s congress supervision is ''flexible but not rigid enough'', we need to make the supervisory work more visible, find out and deal with the problems existing in the operation of supervisory power in time through all-round process supervision and rigid accountability methods, so as to enhance the effectiveness of supervision.