英文摘要 |
The principle of legality is facing more challenges in the modern information society than ever before. In judicial practice, most of the acts of obstructing business by using computer information system are charged of the crime of sabotaging production and business operation, while a few are dealt with as the crime of destroying computer information system or the crime of illegal business operation. However, the crime of sabotaging production and business operation belongs to the property crime by using physical force to destroy means of production. In contrast, the crime of destroying computer information system has strict and clear restrictions on the behavior means. The crime of illegal business operation has the problem of determining that the defendant violates national regulations. When using means other than the aforementioned perpetrating act to obstruct the normal business of others, the current judicial practice adopts the ''soft interpretation'' based on the policy considerations to expand the scope of punishment. However, this uncertain practice always faces the doubt that it may violate the principle of legality, which makes the crime of sabotaging production and business operation and the crime of destroying computer information system or the crime of illegal business operation become ''pocket crime''. In order to punish all kinds of harmful behaviors of obstructing business by using information network and fill the ''intentional legal blank'' in the current legislation, and to reduce the pressure on the principle of legality, it is necessary to add specific crime of obstructing business to protect legal interest in a comprehensive way. |