英文摘要 |
With the removal of barriers to foreign direct investment (FDI) which follows the lowering of barriers to trade, the neo-liberal globalization has ultimately challenged state sovereignty. Under the push of the United States as well as the pressure of multinational capital, since 1995 the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) began to initiate negotiation of multilateral agreement on investment (MAI) which would have high standards of liberalization with scarcely a mention of the social responsibility of corporations. In the language of the opponents, this is not an investment agreement, but a corporate rule agreement. As the negotiation dragged on, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), opposed to the MAI, gained ground. This occurred largely as a result of intensive NGO lobbying of several OECD member states. Also, the Internet greatly facilitated activities of NGO activists. This article examines how the anti-MAI campaign emerged, worked, and had influence, seeking to apply Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink's advocacy network theory to this case study. |