英文摘要 |
This article systematically examines the ways in which collective identity of the signatory states of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) emerges in regard to the various functional requirements of the treaty. The discussion in this article reiterates a theme that the two aspects of a collective identity within which the states interact. In power politics, discrimination imbedded in the NPT creates an unequal foundation upon which the duties and privileges of the NPT states rest. In identity politics, a double standard inherent in the NPT activates parameters by which the interactions of the NPT states intensify. The passive parameter stifles cooperation among states whereas the active parameter encourages such cooperation. The non-nuclear weapon small states status helps to nurture critical imagination of the NPT, whereas the nuclear weapons such status results in dampening the prestige of the NPT. Accordingly, the small non-nuclear weapon states, when presenting a broader challenge to the political ascendance of the big nuclear weapons states in each issue domain of the NPT, yield more flexible and accommodative solutions. |