治絲愈棼的國際關係理論研究－－對黃旻華先生的評論之回應

A Reply to Huang's Comment

黃文對於個人論文的誤解，源自黃文主觀地認定建構主義只有Wendt－家別無分號，也未能理解建構主義的哲學背景以及建構主義在其他學科的影響，其次，對於建構主義的內部差異或是學者對建構主義的分類，未能理解這皆是依學者分類基準與研究旨趣而來。建構主義本身「絕對」不是一種知識論的絕對主義，它是歡迎更多的討論。

Mr. Huang has misunderstood and misinterpreted my views as well as those of some other scholars which I cited. Huang's comments are focused on the categorization of constructivism. What is constructivism? Agreeing on a clear definition is difficult, yet scholars agree upon characteristics or tenets to describe this phenomenon. Meanwhile, the typology of constructivism is based on the scholar's research purpose. I am against any absoluteness, even Wendt's; he is not and should not be the flag bearer of orthodox constructivism.