我們不一樣：臺灣中輟多元教育輔導策略之探討

We are different: A Discussion on the Multi-Education Counseling Strategies for Dropout Students in Taiwan

臺灣中輟問題在政府近年的努力下，成效卓越，中輟通報人數逐年下降，中輟復學率超過85%。然而，當政府聘用大量專輔教師及專業輔導人員，進入校園輔導中輟生時，並未有明顯的中輟輔導成效。

研究發現，聘用大量專輔教師及專業輔導人員的成效，主要呈現在提高國中升學率；然而，高級中等學校學生休學人數卻也同時增加，故我們可以將中輟生或未升學未就業的未成年，視為不同生命發展路徑之群體。同時，彈性化多元教育措施及中輟輔導方案，未能對中輟生發揮功效，故本文認為應提供更彈性化的介入與服務，並重新檢討中輟通報方式及表單內容，俾供我國中輟輔導策略之參酌。

 

With the efforts of the government in recent years, the number of dropouts in Taiwan has decreased year by year, and the rate of returning to school has exceeded 85%. However, the government has hired a large number of professional school guidance counselors to provide guidance to dropout students without significant results.

The study found that the service effectiveness of professional school guidance counselors is mainly in improving the progression rate of middle school students. However, the number of suspensions for students in senior secondary schools has also increased. Therefore, we can regard the dropouts or the minors who have not entered university or employment as groups with different life development paths. At the same time, flexible multi-education programs and drop-out counseling programs have failed to work for dropout students. This article argues that more flexible interventions and services should be provided for dropout students, and re-examine the notification process and form content to provide counseling strategies for dropout students.