月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
政大法學評論 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
訴訟外民事紛爭解決程序中公平合理原則之適用——以金融消費評議事件之運用為中心
並列篇名
The Application of the Fair and Reasonable Principle in Alternative Dispute Resolutions: Focused on Financial Consumer Disputes Decided by Ombudsmen
作者 王怡蘋姜世明
中文摘要
公平合理原則於我國民事程序法及訴外紛爭解決程序中,不乏具體體現之規定,例如:民事訴訟法第377條之1第3項、第436條之14、強制執行法第1條、鄉鎮市調解條例第19條、政府採購法第6條、仲裁法第31條等,其作用及於實體及裁判等不同層次,包括契約解釋、法律適用、基於公平考量之例外限制規定、舉證責任分配、證據調查等。我國金融消費者保護法第20條第1項參考英國金融評議人制度,明定評議機構應依公平合理原則作成決定,鑑於金融商品服務多樣化及金融消費爭議之特殊性,英國金融消費評議機構就公平合理原則發展出有別於法院依法裁判之操作模式,本文藉由案例類型化之比較分析,分從責任成立、責任範圍及程度,評估如何適用公平合理原則,並歸納出操作標準供實務參考之用。
英文摘要
Several expressions regarding the fair and reasonable principle exist both in the Civil Procedural Law and out-of-court alternative dispute resolutions. For example, Section 3 of Article 377-1 and Article 436-14 of the Civil Procedural Law, Article 1 of the Compulsory Enforcement Law, Article 19 of the Town Ship of Mediation Law, Article 6 of the Government Procurement Law, Article 31 of Arbitration Law, etc. The principle’s function lies across substantial laws as well as judicial adjudications, including contract construction, application of law rules, exceptional limitation based on fairness consideration, allocation of burden of proof, evidence investigation, etc. Referencing to the financial ombudsman scheme in the UK, the Section 1, Article 20 of Taiwan’s Financial Consumer Protection Law expressly stated that the financial ombudsman’s decision should be made based on the fair and reasonable principle. Due to the variety of financial products and characteristics of financial disputes, the Financial Ombudsman Service (UK) has developed specific practice when handling financial disputes, no matter the court will make the same judgment or not. Through comparative case study with typology methods, the essay evaluates under what circumstances and to what extent the fair and reasonable principle should be applied when imposing liabilities to financial institutions. Several inductive operation standards are then given for practice use.
起訖頁 1-86
關鍵詞 公平合理原則訴外紛爭解決程序金融消費評議評議決定衡平仲裁顯失公平衡平原則合理期待公平對待客戶不公平契約條款The Fair and Reasonable PrincipleAlternative Dispute ResolutionFinancial OmbudsmanOmbudsman's DecisionAmiable Composition (ex aequo et bono)UnconscionabilityEquity PrincipleReasonable ExpectationTreat Customer FairlyUnfair Contractual Terms
刊名 政大法學評論  
期數 201909 (158期)
出版單位 國立政治大學法律學系
DOI 10.3966/102398202019090158001   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-下一篇 變動中之民事醫療過失判定基準
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄