規章式金融法律供給模式研究－－以「天策公司和偉傑公司股權代持糾紛案」為切入

A Study of Regulatory Financial Law'S Supply Model: Analyzing from the Dispute of “Tien-Tse and Wei-Chieh's Entrusted Shareholding Case”

中國大陸金融領域法律規範主要由金融監管部門通過制定部門規章的方式實現供給。此供給模式具有其歷史原因，是中國大陸金融市場形成過程的一個合乎實踐邏輯的結果，在可見的未來中將繼續存在。此種供給模式是實用主義改革思路的體現，較為妥當地緩解了金融法律供需矛盾，與行政規章數量增長的比較法趨勢相契合，具有合理性。但在實踐中，金融部門規章存在超越法律授權、與上位法相衝突等問題，抑制了金融私法規範的生成。由此，金融監管的部門規章不能直接成為判定合同效力的依據。經法院審查，滿足條件的金融監管的部門規章可成為裁判說理的依據，影響合同效力的判定。

The financial legislations in the PRC are mainly supplied by financial regulatory agency ‘s rules. This supply model, which is a reasonable result derived from the development process of PRC financial market, has its historical background and will continue to exist in the foreseeable future. Such model is reasonable as it embodies the revolutionary pragmatism, properly alleviates the dilemma of financial law’s supply and demand, and aligns with the comparative law’s trend of increasing administrative rules. However, in practice, there exist problems including financial agency rules’ supersession of their legal authorization scope and the conflicts with higher level laws, hindering the development of financial private law. Therefore, the financial regulatory authority’s agency rules shall not be the direct basis to determine a contract’s validity. Upon court’s review, qualified agency rules may serve as judgment’s basis and influence the determination of contract validity.