月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
累犯與處斷刑加重之裁量:評大法官釋字第775號解釋暨後續實務裁判
並列篇名
Recidivists and the Decision of Aggravated Discretionary Punishment: Comments on the J.Y. Interpretation No.755 and the Subsequent Judicial Practice
作者 許恒達
中文摘要
本文討論大法官釋字第775號解釋中,針對累犯合憲性的釋字見解以及後續實務因應該號釋字所提出的解釋方向,由於本號釋字對於累犯加重處斷刑的法理定性不清,導致接續刑事司法裁判發生個案是否一律提高累犯處斷刑下限的嚴重爭議,大法官甚至在協同或不同意見書中提出南轅北轍的司法解釋建議。本文主張未來應修法廢除累犯,而在累犯修正之前,應從不法/罪責加重的雙重事由,依個案是否同時符合雙重加重事由決定累犯是否加重本刑之上、下限。
英文摘要
This article aims to discuss the constitutionality of recidivists illustrated under the J.Y. Interpretation No.755 and the explanatory directions resulted from the subsequent judicial practice. Serious disputes over whether to uniformly aggravate the discretionary punishment’s lower limit for recidivists have occurred as the Interpretation failed to clarify the legal reasoning for such punishment, and even the Grand Justices have provided different suggestions for judicial interpretations in the concurring or dissenting opinions. This article opines that we should amend the law to abrogate recidivists and determine whether to aggravate the upper and lower limits for recidivists in each case based on the satisfaction of dual aggravation causes (i.e. aggravated unlawfulness and culpability) before such amendment.
起訖頁 5-32
關鍵詞 累犯處斷刑不法加重警告模式特別預防RecidivistDiscretioary PunishmentAggravated UnlawfulnessWarning
刊名 月旦法學雜誌  
期數 201911 (294期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
DOI 10.3966/102559312019110294001  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-下一篇 當弦外之音成為主弦律──評釋字第775號解釋兼論解釋公布後之量刑新趨勢
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄