月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
從公司法第一條修正談公司治理之內外部機制──兼論企業社會責任的推動模式
並列篇名
Reflections from the Amendment to Article 1 of Taiwan's Company Act in 2018 on Internal and External Accountability Mechanisms of Corporate Governance: With a Look at How to Promote Corporate Social Responsibility
作者 蔡昌憲
中文摘要
二○一八年公司法第一條增訂第二項,一方面彰顯包含法令遵循在內之企業內部自律機制對公司治理的重要;另方面指出公司應將企業社會責任內化至其業務經營中。然而,縱使我國近年來持續地引進英美的公司治理模式(例如獨立董事及審計委員會之漸進式強制設置),惟僅透過屬公部門法規之外部他律機制強化董事會獨立性,似仍不足完善公司治理。本文主張應同步將政府面以及市場面之外部他律機制帶動的監督力量內化到企業內部自律機制中,以作為移植英美公司治理模式的必要配套。在此等公司治理生態系中內外部機制的互補作用下,經由公私部門的合作治理,一方面持續提升臺灣公司內部治理之品質;他方面讓企業社會責任得與時俱進地內化至公司內部自律機制與業務經營之中。
英文摘要
The amendment to Article 1 of Taiwan’s Company Act demonstrates, on the one hand, that internal accountability mechanisms including legal compliance programs matter, and, on the other hand, that firms should internalize corporate social responsibilities ( “CSR”) into their daily operation. Nevertheless, even if the Taiwanese government has been mandating corporate governance (“CG”) models of Anglo-American independent directors and audit committees step by step, we cannot rely only on such external accountability mechanisms as government regulation to improve corporate governance. I argue that the focus should be on external accountability mechanisms of both market constraints and their governmental counterparts altogether, and that, as necessary supplements to the transplantation of the Anglo-American CG models into Taiwan, oversight dynamics derived from both the aforementioned constraints should at the same time be incorporated into internal accountability mechanisms. In this case, internal and external accountability mechanisms in the CG ecosystem will be harmonic with each other to keep management in check. Meanwhile, with such public-private collaborative governance, internal corporate governance in Taiwan will be advanced on the one hand; on the other, internal accountability mechanisms can be adaptable to integrate CSR with firms’ daily management.
起訖頁 89-153
關鍵詞 公司治理生態系私部門治理董事資訊請求權獨立董事審計委員會獨立治理資訊獲取管道公司治理人員吹哨者管制謙抑性公私部門合作治理corporate governance ecosystemprivate governancedirector right to informationindependent directorsaudit committeesindependent channels for obtaining governance informationcorporate governance officerswhistleblowersregulatory humility/flexibilitypublic-private collaborative governance
刊名 成大法學  
期數 201812 (36期)
出版單位 國立成功大學法律學研究所;成大法學編輯委員會
DOI 10.3966/168067192018120036003  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 稅捐資訊通報與稅法──國際資訊交換下一般性及德國法觀點之探討(譯文)
該期刊-下一篇 我國老人保護安置費用追償之實務課題及政策因應
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄