Introduction: Despite many published guidelines for appropriate admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), surgical patients are frequently admitted to the surgical ICU without following these criteria. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine the impact of our practice of the SICU admission on the utilization of hospital resources and patient outcomes. Methods: We prospectively collected information of all surgical patients admitted to SICU between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014. We compared demographic data and clinical outcome of those admitted for less than 48 hours (short stay) with data of those staying in SICU for longer than two days (regular stay). Results: There were 408 out of 1,278 patients admitted to SICU for less than 48 hours (mean=20.73±5.30 hours). These short stay patients were more likely to have operations and with lower admission APACHE II scores. The readmission rates to SICU within 48 hours were significantly lower for short stay patients (1.69% vs. 4.04%, p<0.05). Finally, more emergency room patients were admitted to the MICU or burn unit due to lack of available SICU beds when the unit had short stay patients. Conclusion: Our policy of liberal admission of surgical patients to SICU has its merit especially when SICU beds are available. However, it does have some drawbacks including diverting patients to nonsurgical ICUs, placing more pressure on nurse staffing, and spending more medical resources. It is time to develop more stringent criteria for SICU admission and to design stepdown units to serve as a gap between ICU and wards in order to free SICU beds for more critical patients.