月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
篇名
精神科強制入院患者聲請終止醫療遭駁回,二審判決發回重審   檔案下載
並列篇名
Termination of Medical Treatment Applied by a Psychiatric Patient Who Was Sent to Compulsory Admission Was Refused
作者 黃浥昕
中文摘要
本件原告向法院提出出院聲請遭駁回,原告不服,遂依醫療觀察法第64條提出抗告。二審法院審理發現,儘管一審法院認為持續入院有讓行為人得到治療之可能性,但依醫療機構負責人意見,若不同意其有治療可能性,即無理由認為持續入院能讓行為人得到充分治療。又即使行為人果真屬於須持續入院的狀況,一審法院仍應依照醫療觀察法第51條第1款的規定,基於醫療機構負責人等人的意見進行審查,但本件未透過會議等管道諮詢相關人員意見,並與相關人員進行意見交換,亦未重新對行為人進行精神鑑定、未公開審判日期等,在程序上諸多瑕疵,審判過程確實欠缺合理性、妥當性。
英文摘要
The plaintiff applied to the court but was refused. Being unsatisfied, the plaintiff appealed according to paragraph 46 of Act of Medical Observation. After judging, the second instance court confirmed that there couldn’t be any reason for compulsory admission to make patient have sufficient medical treatments without any possibility of medical treatments according to the opinion of director of the medical institute, even though the possibility of medical treatments had been confirmed by the first instance court. Furthermore, if the patient would indeed be necessary to compulsory admission, the first instance court should take the opinions of medical institutes into the consideration according to paragraph 51 of Act of Medical observation. However, there were no conference asking opinions of related personnel and discussing about the patient’s situation. What’s more, there were neither any mental identification nor any date for open trial for him in the disputed case. There were many false of procedure and the judgment was lack of the legitimacy and adequacy as the consequence.
起訖頁 121-126
關鍵詞 心神喪失終止醫療強制住院精神耗弱醫療觀察法insanetermination of medical treatmentcompulsory admissionfeeblemindedAct of Medical Observation
刊名 月旦醫事法報告  
期數 201809 (23期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
該期刊-上一篇 醫學倫理調解特色及運用
該期刊-下一篇 護理勞動權益:假定期勞動契約與真不定期勞動契約
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄