環評審查結論之條件與環評承諾於行政訴訟中相關爭議問題之探討

A Study on the Legal Issues about Conditional Appravol of Environmental Impact Assessment Review and Commitments of the Environmental Impact Statement in the Administrative Prceeding

就環評書件而言，對開發單位產生規制效力者，除有無「通過」環境影響評估（以下簡稱「環評」）的主文之外，涉及「有條件通過環評審查」時，尚包含「有條件通過」之「條件」以及開發單位在環境影響說明書（以下簡稱「環說書」）或審查會議所提出之「承諾」等三大部分。前述之「條件」與「承諾」逐漸成為行政訴訟爭議之焦點。儘管二者之爭議內涵有所不同，前者聚焦在附加附款時之容許性與限制，並攸關該結論得否合法存續；至於後者，則關乎「承諾」是否為環評法第十七條之一部分，從而開發單位應依承諾切實執行。因此確切掌握其法律上之容許性及其限制，亦攸關確保環評制度不被濫用。惟行政法院之立場，與環評主管機關未盡相同；甚至在「環評承諾」上，相關判決間立場亦不盡一致，而有深入探究之必要。

Environmental impact assessment documents with the meaning of Taiwan’s EIAA, which are binding on the developers, contain three major parts: the main text of EIA review reports, conditional approval and commitments made in the environmental impact statement or during the review meeting by the developers, when it comes conditional approval of the environmental impact assessment review of Art. 43 EIAA Enforcement Rules. Although the foregoing conditions and commitments are different in legal disputes, on the one hand, whether their legal admissibility and limitations are correctly understood, could ensure that the EIA system is not abused. On the other hand, these have been widely adopted in the reports of the EIA review, therefore, it gradually became the focal point of administrative litigation. However, relevant disputes have not been fully discussed in the lecture and the relevant judgments have also appeared inconsistent positions. Therefore, it is worthwhile to study them.