月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
篇名
顱內動脈瘤栓塞術術後產生肢體障礙   檔案下載
並列篇名
Physical Disabilities of Limbs after taking an Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysm
作者 黃浥昕
中文摘要
本件原告X於被告Y醫院接受左、右腦之顱內動脈瘤栓塞術,於術後產生左上下肢身體障礙之後遺症,X對此主張被告醫院於手術適應症之判斷、手術之手技、兩次手術間隔的設定、術後的病情觀察等四點違反注意義務;另術前未詳盡說明其他可選擇之治療方法,亦違反說明義務,從而基於債務不履行及侵權行為(使用者責任)向院方請求賠償。最終法院雖否認被告醫院有任何醫療疏失,且該說明義務違反與X損害間未存在因果關係,仍以侵害之X人格權(自己決定權)造成X精神上之痛苦,判決被告醫院應支付440萬日圓的賠償金。
英文摘要
After the plaintiff X had taken an embolization of intracranial aneurysm in the hospital as the accused Y, X had his upper and under limbs physical disable. X claimed that Y had obeyed four due diligences, including judgments of indications, techniques of the surgeries, the interval between two surgeries and observations after the surgeries. Duty of the explanation for any alternative was also not fulfilled. Therefore, X advocated civil compensation based on non-performance of obligation and infringement to the hospital. The court denied any medical negligence by the hospital and determined that there was no causal relationship between duty of the explanation and X’s damages. Nevertheless, the Y still caused the damage of X’s right of personality because of lacking the self-decision, and it caused X’s spiritual pain. Y should pay 4,400,000 Yen as the compensation.
起訖頁 122-129
關鍵詞 人格權告知說明義務醫療疏失顱內動脈瘤栓塞術the right of personalityduty of the explanationmedical negligenceembolization of intracranial aneurysm
刊名 月旦醫事法報告  
期數  (19期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
該期刊-上一篇 【醫療行政法】健保資料庫行政訴訟案:醫學研究與資訊隱私間的衝突
該期刊-下一篇 告知說明義務系列:醫師之說明義務,以實質上已說明為必要
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路18 號 5 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄