The patient as the plaintiff complains that the physician as the accused didn’t explain the risk of the possible palsy before taking the operation according to his duty. The accused had therefore to take the responsibility for the compensation. The supreme court affirmed that the palsy which was explained by the physician before the operation is generally a persistent palsy according to cases in the past, if the patient didn’t ask forward. Besides, it had been already one of the medical standards. Therefore, the accused had done her duty of explanation before taking the operation that the operation might cause to a palsy possibly, and has no responsibility for the damage.