論意定代理權消滅型表見代理

On Apparent Agency in the Case of Termination of Authority

在意定代理權消滅的情況下，由於被代理人曾授予代理人以代理權，可以說被代理人引起代理人享有代理權的外觀，並且未採取適當的方式消除該外觀。倘相對人方面有合理的信賴，應成立表見代理。為保護交易安全，在認定合理信賴是否成立時，不應給相對人施加一般的調查、審查義務。在被代理人進行授權通知以及授權書被交付和出示的情況下，相對人的信賴更應加以保護，從而原則上成立表見代理，除非成立推定的知情。如推定知情的要件不成立，也可以結合個案情況，以顯著性為標準認定相對人應當知道代理權的消滅，從而法律行為不對被代理人發生效力。

In the case of termination of authorised authority, since the principal once granted authority to the agent, it can be said that the principal created the appearance of authority and he did not take appropriate measures to eliminate that appearance. If the third party has reasonable reliance, there exists apparent agency. To protect transaction security, when judging reasonable reliance, one should not impose general duty of investigation and examination. If the principal announced that he had granted authority to another by special notice or public notice, or letter of authorisation was delivered and presented, the third party should be protected, so apparent agency exists in principle, unless there is presumed knowledge. When presumed knowledge does not exist, according to the concrete situation, taking significance as standard, one can also affirm that the third party should know the perishing of authority, thus the legal transaction does not bind the principal.