月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
成大法學 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
論德國「逃避刑事程序之虞」羈押原因
並列篇名
Flight Risk as the Ground for Pretrial Detention in the German Law
作者 陳松檀
中文摘要

我國刑事訴訟制度就「保全性羈押」中,關於以保全被告在程序中到場之對人強制處分類型,依刑事訴訟法第一百零一條第一項第一款規定,僅限於以被告逃亡或有逃亡之虞為其羈押原因,就實務上時而所見,被告並未逃亡,而係以不當使用或停用醫師處方藥物等,自陷無就審能力狀態之方式,達到逃避刑事審判及執行之情形,則無法規範。本文將藉由介紹德國法關於「有逃避刑事程序之虞」羈押原因之規定,說明該國對於類似情形之處理方式,以供參考。

英文摘要
In our criminal suit system on the “secure type detention”, concerning the process to secure the defendant, right on the spot, the type to have him or her subject to forceful measure, in accordance with the provisions of Clause 1, Item 1 of Article 101 of the criminal suit (proceedings) is limited to the fear that the defendant will flee or might flee as the ground for detention. As a matter of fact as often seen, the defendant has not fled and by improper use or stopping use of prescription drugs, etc. to fall into a state of being unable to stand trial, to escape the criminal trial and the implementation of the situation; so far it can not be regulated. This article will provide a reference to the way in which Germany deals with similar circumstance in the context of introduction of the provisions of Germany with regard to the reasons for detention “ in fear of escaping the criminal proceedings.”
起訖頁 123-163
關鍵詞 羈押逃亡自殺逃亡之虞逃避刑事程序就審 能力detentionflightsuicideflight riskavoid the criminal proceedingcapacity to stand trial
刊名 成大法學  
期數 201706 (33期)
出版單位 國立成功大學法律學研究所;成大法學編輯委員會
DOI 10.3966/168067192017060033004   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 成立WTO爭端解決小組之請求與「先決異議」
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄