月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
厦门大学法律评论 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
論基於心學的法治正義觀
並列篇名
Justice Concept of Rule of Law Based on Confucianism Mindphilosophy
作者 朱祖飛
中文摘要
本體法律正義已經超出人類的認識範圍,屬於信仰的範疇。法律正義屬於超認識領域,人類無法制定像自然科學一樣的嚴密法律規則體系。在俗世正義觀層面,中國傳統心學已經初步回答了這一問題,也就是“心外無理”。“心外無理”打破了從客觀上尋找法律正義的可能;否則,人類必然失去自由,走向奴役之途。基於此,再慮及個人之間的平等性,故而俗世正義的基礎只能是多數決,當然,這種多數決應當建立在民眾的普遍良知基礎上。在司法過程中,“說理”是通往俗世良知共識即多數決正義的路徑。
英文摘要
The ontological legal justice has gone beyond human’s understanding and is considered a kind of belief. Legal justice belongs to the domain of supraconsciousness. Unlike natural science, human beings are unable to prepare a strict legal system. At the worldly level, Chinese traditional mindphilosophy has preliminarily put an answer to this, which is known as “Logos in Mind” (no logos can exist outside mind). “Logos in Mind” has broken the possibility of identifying legal justice objectively as otherwise human beings will lose their freedom and become slaved. Only on the basis of above findings should we consider the equality among people. That is why the worldly justice shall be based on majority decision, which is established on top of the common conscience of the mass. In legal proceedings, “reasoning” is the path towards reaching consensus on worldly conscience, i.e. the majority rule on justice.
起訖頁 137-184
關鍵詞 法律正義法律本體多數決心學正義legal justicelegal ontologymajority rulejustice on Confucianism Mind philosophy
刊名 厦门大学法律评论  
期數 201704 (29期)
出版單位 廈門大學法學院
DOI 10.3966/615471682017040029009   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 論法律與東方主義
該期刊-下一篇 從法益衡量到利益衡量:違法阻卻事由的消弭與實質違法性的興起
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄