北大巨蛋開發案之環評爭議探討（下）──臺北高等行政法院一○○年度訴字第一七五一號、最高行政法院一○二年度判字第四五三號判決之研析

A Case Study on the Environmental Impact Assessment of Taipei Dome Project

柯文哲於民國（下同）一○三年十一月二十四日當選臺北市長後，臺北市政府旋即作成大巨蛋開發案之安全體檢報告，指出該開發案之設計有諸多違失，使大巨蛋開發案之安全性問題成為全國矚目之焦點。其實，臺北市政府環評審查委員會早於一○○年五月二十六日就作成有條件通過環評審查之審查結論後，鄰近居民即循序對相關行政處分提起行政訴訟，分別經臺北高等行政法院一○○年度訴字第一七五一號及最高行政法院一○二年度判字第四五三號作成判決。本文係研討上開判決關於大巨蛋開發案之鄰近居民是否具有提起本案訴訟之訴訟權能，及環評法第三條第二項後段迴避規定之闡述，並提出筆者個人想法。

After Ko Wen-Je winning the Taipei City mayor election on Nov. 24, 2014, the security report of the Taipei City Dome Project was soon made by Taipei City government, indicated several faulty designs of the project. In fact, after Environmental Impact Assessment Review Committee conditionally approved the project on May 26, 2011, nearby residents filed a lawsuit against related administrative disciplinary action, and Taipei High Administrative Court and Supreme Administrative Court made their verdicts. This article is the study on the verdicts, focus on the theory of protective norms, and Environmental Impact Assessment Act Article 3, section 2, which is written “ When the industry competent authority is the developer, industry competent authority members shall withdraw from the voting process.” In the end, the author will offer several thoughts about the disputes.