月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
醫療糾紛及醫療事故補償法草案評析
並列篇名
Comments on the Draft Medical Disputes and Medical Malpractice Compensation Act
作者 謝榮堂
中文摘要
醫療糾紛為病人認醫療行為有不良結果,而應由醫事人員或醫療(事)機構負責所生爭議。草案所定醫療糾紛,係屬病人對於醫事人員或醫療(事)機構之私權爭議,傷亡結果與醫療行為間具有因果關係。近年來醫療糾紛逐漸增加,漫長之訴訟程序對於任何一方皆是折磨,甚至造成醫界恐慌。有鑑於此,衛生福利部提出醫糾法草案,內容主要希望以行政補償方式減少醫療訴訟,然醫療糾紛本質及特性,基於憲法第十六條訴訟權制度性保障,恐有疑慮。
英文摘要
Medical disputes of medical practice for patients to recognize a bad result, but by medical personnel or medical agency to responds for dispute. Draft set of medical disputes, the Department of private rights as a patient for medical personnel or medical controversy (thing) institutions, among casualties result and medical practices have a causal relationship. In recent years, increasing medical disputes, long the proceedings for any party are all suffering, and even cause panic in the medical community. In view of this, the Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical correcting draft law, mainly hope to compensate for administrative means to reduce medical litigation, however the nature and characteristics of medical disputes, based on Article 16 of the Constitution guarantees the right of action system, fear of doubts.
起訖頁 142-157
關鍵詞 醫療糾紛醫療鑑定醫療補償醫療事故告知義務Medical DisputesMedical IdentificationMedical CompensationMedical Malpracticethe Duty of Disclosure
刊名 月旦法學雜誌  
期數 201603 (250期)
出版單位 元照出版有限公司
DOI 10.3966/102559312016030250009  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 二○一五年新修正臺灣保險法關於保險經紀人義務相關規定之評析
該期刊-下一篇 國門前的難民──不遣返原則與難民法
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄