月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
家事暫時處分性質疑義
並列篇名
Questions about Preliminary Injunctions under the Law of Domestic Proceedings
作者 魏大喨
中文摘要
家事事件法第八五條以下訂有暫時處分制度,做為家事非訟事件之保全方法。又因本法已將若干原屬家事財產訴訟事件非訟化,債權人如有保全本案請求權將來執行實現必要者,仍須有保全處分機制,方足以構築一完整之財產權程序保障。惟暫時處分之性質及具體機能為何,是否包括假扣押及標的物假處分程序,本法未做定義性規定。雖暫時處分之類型及其方法,本法已授權司法院制定辦法,惟仍難自該辦法文義中判讀其機能。因此,暫時處分是否已完全取代保全處分全部機能,或存在立法疏漏,須法官為法律漏洞之填補。
英文摘要
Article 85 to 91 of the Law of Domestic Proceedings stipulates the preliminary injunctions, which serve as the provisional remedies for domestic affairs. Since the Law has transformed some domestic litigation cases into non-contentious ones, the existence of provisional remedies proceedings are necessary to ensure the full realization of creditors’ rights in the future. However, there is no definition for the essences and functions of preliminary injunctions. Also, it is also unclear whether provisional attachments or provisional injunctions are included or not. Although Judicial Yuan has been authorized to formulate a regulation over preliminary injunctions, it is hard to determine their functions from the context. Therefore, whether preliminary injunctions can completely replaces all provisional remedies remains a question. It may be a legal loophole that judges need to cure.
起訖頁 148-162
關鍵詞 暫時處分規制性處分保全性處分審前保全定暫時狀態處分Preliminary InjunctionsRegulatory DispositionProvisional RemediesProvisional Remedies ProceedingsInjunctions Maintaining a Temporary Status
刊名 月旦法學雜誌  
期數 201509 (244期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
DOI 10.3966/102559312015090244010  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 關於代理的相關問題──幾則實務判決評析
該期刊-下一篇 添附、看作、專利進步性(上)
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄