月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
從司法權完整性探討司法院職務法庭組織建構
並列篇名
Analyzing the Court of the Judiciary's Structure of from the Viewpoint of Completeness of the Judicial Power
作者 魏大喨
中文摘要
法官法明定司法院設職務法庭,掌理法官懲戒及法官不服司法行政處分之司法救濟審。職務法庭法官產生,由司法院院長提請法官遴選委員會遴任。因職務法庭正掌理與司法院有關之各種審判事項,司法院復為其職務監督人。此與德國以法官自治原理建構職務法庭者,大異其趣。司法權包括司法行政權及司法審判權,司法院院長就司法權行使成敗須負最終責任,如無職務法庭法官人選之最終決定權與職務監督權,則是否符合責任政治法理?
英文摘要
The Judges Act requires the Judicial Yuan to establish the Court of the Judiciary, which takes charge of judges disciplinary cases and remedy procedures. Under the request of the President of Judicial Yuan, the appointments of judges of the Court of the Judiciary will be made by Judicial Selection Committee. However, while the Court is in charge of all the adjudication matters, the Judicial Yuan acts as its supervisory body at the meantime. This completely differs from the German structure, which founded the Court under the principle of judge autonomy. More, the judicial power encompasses both judicial administrative and adjudicative power, and the President shall bear the final responsibility. If the President fails to appoint and supervise the judges, it may also violate the essence of responsible politics.
起訖頁 137-157
關鍵詞 職務法庭法官自治司法權完整性法官遴選委員會職務處分the Court of the JudiciaryJudge AutonomyCompleteness of the Judicial Power
刊名 月旦法學雜誌  
期數 201508 (243期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
DOI 10.3966/102559312015080243009  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 附帶搜索及其要件
該期刊-下一篇 違法安定與人權正義──論行政程序重新進行與確定判決既判力之衝突
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄