政府採購得標廠商進用原住民的合憲性探討──釋字第七一九號解釋評析

The Constitutionality of Requiring the Contractor under the Governmental Procurement Law to Hire Indigenous People: A Critical Analysis of the J.Y. Interpretation No. 719

釋字第七一九號，是臺灣釋憲史上第一次出現涉及原住民相關基本權保障的釋義契機，使釋憲機關有機會從原住民相關基本權保障的觀點，展開其對原住民族保障相關法制的放射效力論證，為臺灣原住民族保障相關法制奠定良好基礎。本號解釋不僅開啟了原住民族基本權客觀法的保障，而且建立了定期的檢討修正機制，並類型化了基本權的合憲性檢驗，值得肯定。但本號解釋也同時出現了基本權的涵攝與侵犯、憲法正當性理由論述、比例原則與平等原則適用、以及審查標準的酌定等相關憲法爭點，值得加以探討。

The J.Y. Interpretation No. 719 is the first case involving the protections of the fundamental rights of the indigenous people in the history of constitutional interpretations in Taiwan which gives the Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan a chance to start from the viewpoint of the protection of the fundamental rights of the indigenous people to elaborate the constitutionality of relevant laws implementing the protection of the fundamental rights of indigenous people and to lay the solid constitutional foundation of related laws with regarding the protection of indigenous people. It is praiseworthy because it not only initiates the objective legal protection of the fundamental rights of indigenous people, but also establishes the mechanism of periodical review and categorizes the judicial reviews of the fundamental rights. However, it at the same time discusses the inclusion and infringement of the fundamental rights and the reasoning of the constitutionality. It contains the constitutional issues of the utilization of the principle of proportionality, the principle of equality, and the standard of judicial review. All of above requires a further discussion.