月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
表決權拘束契約與累積投票制
並列篇名
Voting Agreement and Cumulative Voting
作者 邵慶平
中文摘要
臺灣最高法院向來認為表決權拘束契約係屬無效,其主要論據則是此一契約的運作有背於公司法中所規定之強制性累積投票制的立法目的。相較之下,雖然絕大多數學者支持表決權拘束契約應屬有效,但為數不少的學者似亦支持現行法下累積投票制的規定。本文認為造成此一現象的原因是變更章程的多數決與契約修改的一致決之間的差異。本文主張:若能將少數股東的保護納入考量,任意性的累積投票制應能獲得廣泛支持。唯有如此,表決權拘束契約的有效性方能為司法實務所衷心認同。
英文摘要
In Taiwan, it has long been held by the Supreme Court that the shareholders’ voting agreement is invalid. The Supreme Court believes the operation of shareholders’ voting agreement would have jeopardized the purpose of the mandatory cumulative voting regime, which was put into Taiwan’s Company Law in 1966. While almost all Taiwan’s academics, to the author’s knowledge, criticize the Supreme Court’s stance on this voting agreement issue, many of them seem to favor the current cumulative voting rule. This paper argues that this inconsistency stems from the difference between the majority rule in corporate charter amendment and the consensus rule in contract modification. As long as the protection for minority shareholders can be taken into account, a default rule of cumulative voting will gain strong support from academics and practitioners. Only under such circumstances can the validity of shareholders’ voting agreement be well-received by the judges as well as scholars. 
起訖頁 103-114
關鍵詞 累積投票制表決權拘束契約股東協議契約自由私法自治Cumulative VotingVoting AgreementShareholders’ AgreementFreedom of ContractParty Autonomy
刊名 月旦民商法雜誌  
期數 201506 (48期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
DOI 10.3966/172717622015060048005  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 中國大陸證券市場內幕交易的法律規制
該期刊-下一篇 非保險業經營保險之修法及司法實務走向──聚焦保險要件於互助會案之具體操作
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路18 號 5 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄