英文摘要 |
Can sociologists study the art works with academic legitimacy? V. Zolberg compares the differences of approaches of dealing with the artworks between aestheticians, art historians and social scientific scholars. To make the discussion more focused, Zolberg points the traditional assumptions about art, which are the very starting points for the sociologists to begin their arguments with sociological approaches. For example, the sociologists analyze the social process of creation in order to explore the historical context and structural conditions of artworks, instead of regarding the artworks as kind of unique creation only consisting of artist’s talent. We can start to analyze the artworks in term of social process by taking as problematical the definition of an artwork itself. Besides, analyzing the process of evaluation of an artwork helps to understand how the aesthetics value is constructed by different social actors and groups, often through the process of competition, cooperation, accommodation and ect. But different form some sociologists who ignore the aesthetic experiences of the receptors of artworks, I emphasize in this article the importance of the aesthetic recreation of the consumers/receptors of artworks when we try to study the artworks with a sociological approach. A cross-disciplines methodology is strongly suggested in this article to reach a complete understanding the social meanings and social process of an artwork in a given society during a specific historical period. |