英文摘要 |
Ten Years is a cinema project that projected imaginaries towards Hong Kong's near future. As the film engaged with sensitive political issues, it was boycotted by most of the commercial distributors in Hong Kong. However, the marginal circulation circuits marked its distinctiveness as a unique event of Hong Kong cinema. Under the intensifying political tensions, the cinemas suddenly suspended the screening of Ten Years even it had reached a surprising box office record. The team then switched to an alternative way to circulate the film by organizing community screenings with NGOs. While the film is marginalized from the mainstream distribution channels, it received ''the best movie'' prize from the 35th Hong Kong Film Awards which is a quasi-official institution of recognition of the Hong Kong cinema. However, once Ten Years' nomination was announced, Huanqiu Times, an official media of PRC, accused the directors of ''disseminating despairs'' and ''spreading anxiety around the city.'' Surprisingly some ''progressive'' critics also resonated with such negative view over the ''emotional'' aspect of the texts. This paradox points toward a new path for critical intervention: the politics of emotions. On one hand, Ten Years serves as a medium of emotions that circulated around the society; on the other hand, discourses had been generated through the text's circulation across various fields and social institutions. Such a process also played a significant role in the production of emotions. Resistance and negotiation in this process opened up spaces for investigation of the current conjuncture of Hong Kong. As a new approach to articulate the cultural politics of ''post-Umbrella Movement,'' inspired from Sara Ahmed, Raymond Williams and Wendy Brown's theoretical thinking on emotions, this paper first reconstructed the context of the circulation and then deploy textual analysis of the emotions of Ten Years. |