英文摘要 |
Countries around the world are facing difficulties in adjusting agricultural structures, resulting in poor farmers' incomes, aging rural populations, labor migration, and inadequate public infrastructure. The quality of life caused by these problems has declined, and they are unable to attract industrial entry and population migration into the countryside. The European Union signed the ''Agenda 2000'' in 1999 to incorporate rural development into the second policy pillar of the CAP (Common Agriculture Policy), and set the goal of rural development to enrich local identity and create rural assets. The OECD initiated the New Rural Paradigm in 2006 as a way for their member states to formulate individual rural development strategies| in 2016, they proposed the New Rural Development Paradigm for developing countries to provide developing countries with the framework of the rural development policy shows the international emphasis on rural development, and the Taiwan passed the Rural Revitalization Act in 2010 as the legislative basis for building a rich countryside. Literature review that the country face the rural problems arising from the agricultural recession, and the connotation of rural construction put forward at various stages, mostly from improving farmers' income and quality of life to improving production infrastructure. In Taiwan, the rural regeneration policy is used as the basis for promoting rural development. The rural residents jointly explore rural internal problems through an autonomous bottom-up approach. Under the leadership of leaders, integrate local resources and external organization resources to jointly solve the dilemma of rural social and economic development. This article summarizes the rural field survey of Xingjian Village,Sansing Township, Yilan County, and observes that the social and economic conditions in rural areas have improved. The key lies in mobilizing residents to participate in local affairs, and the motivation for collective action of residents comes from the leadership of local leaders and external organizations. This article also finds that farmers need to provide public goods and services on a voluntary basis and that the government is not the only the distributor of public funds leaders use innovative institutional arrangements and coordination mechanisms for public-private collaboration to manage local agricultural public finances and services. Among them, the local leaders combine some learning-based approaches and treat these farmers as knowledge-based partnerships and interact with each other. In these process, the knowledge contained in different scales is generated, which in turn creates knowledge differences between different organizations. In addition, local leaders give play to their social entrepreneurial spirit, propose innovative ways to develop rural industries, guide social resources into the countryside through cooperative organizations, transform from individual farmers to cooperative organizations, reduce the production costs of individual farmers, and jointly maintain rural ecology. The environment is conducive to the development of the local tourism industry, forming a development model of the Rural Web, and jointly implementing the vision of residents and farmers for sustainable rural development. |