英文摘要 |
This paper will start with the inheritance lawsuit filed by Maoyuan Chang in Shanghai in the middle of the 1930s. Mao-yuan Chang was the aunt of the famous woman writer Eileen Chang. This lawsuit is taken as a point of departure to explore how the traditional inheritance of ancestor worship duties, strictly following the male line only, has been transformed by law into the modern property inheritance system that declares gender equality. This lawsuit will thus be read not merely from the historical or legal perspectives as a concrete action against the oppression of clan patriarchy taken by a particular woman in the Republican China period, but more importantly as a cultural critique. This is a critique of the dominance of clan another inheritance lawsuit filed in Taiwan in the twenty-first century by an aunt in President Ing-wen Tsai's family. This second lawsuit highlights the continuing paradoxes of the political slogan ''one country on each side'' while both retain a cultural heritage of clan patriarchy. That is, we still face persistent clan patriarchy both in Taiwan and China, even though women's equal rights to inherit property has been the law since the 1930s and even when an effort to distance from Chinese culture has been deployed by some in Taiwan as a way to differentiate and fortify the identity of Taiwan as separate from that of Mainland China.patriarchy which extends kinship rights into law, as well as extending the family name strictures to sexuality. In all, there was traditionally an entwinement of gender, sexuality, and ancestral lineage name. The paper will first trace the legal changes from the Enacted Criminal Law of the Qing Dynasty to the Civil Code of the Republic of China. Two side scenes represented in ''The Golden Cangue'' and The Rouge of the North written by Eileen Chang will also be taken as examples that demonstrate the specific characteristics of the Chinese lineage branch cultural complex and family name/gender politics. The paper will end with |