英文摘要 |
In order to explore the decision-making process of journalists when quitting their journalistic job, 20 newspaper and TV journalists who left the press industry after 2013 were interviewed based on the unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. This study shows that the main factors spurring reporters to consider quitting are burnout triggered by digital working conditions and the image violation caused by conflicts between different professional roles. The term ''image violation'' refers to the conflicting mental status triggered by one's inability to achieve personal value, goal and strategy at work, and also takes on the role of helping journalists to introspectively examine themselves during the process of making a final decision. According to the data collected, the total time spent from the preliminary idea of quitting to actually making the decision to quit varies. All the research objects experienced push and pull factors in their minds during this period. Their enthusiasm for journalism, concern over a lack of expertise, and financial burden were the major obstacles to resignation. The social status of journalists not being as respectable as before, job insecurity, and limited salary growth were the motives for leaving a journalistic job. Before the final decision was made, this study also finds that everyone encountered a certain type of shock event and the digital policies and leadership at the media firm for which they worked were two examples that most of the research objects were ever faced with. The findings hence support the assumption of the unfolding model that asserts a shock event is an important factor stimulating one's attempt to quit a job. This research further suggests that the impact of a shock event on decision-making does not necessarily occur in the early stage of the whole process. It does, however, seem to play a significant role in accelerating journalists' determination to part with the industry of journalism. |