三種私有財產證成中的問題及其盲點

On Three Types of Justifications of Private Property:Their Problems and Blind Spots

私有財產之本務論的或定言式的證成（相對於目的論或假言式的），大約可以有三種：勞力、自由，與權利。這三種證成本身都有若干問題，而且各自也都是對方的反命題。若仿效康德「二律背反」的方式，則可以顯示：這個矛盾的狀況，其實來自對於「消費財」與「生產財」的區別的忽視、從而「個人」作為「財產擁有者」與「被別人擁有者」之間的混淆。兩者之所以混淆，又來自於「錢」之作用─後者之作用在於：（一）使人與自然之關係同質，（二）使財產同質，（三）使人與人同質。正是在最後這個「使人與人同質」的基礎上，才樹立了自由主義。

Other than ontologically or hypothetically, the ownership of private property may be justified deontologically or categorically in roughly threeways: by labor, by freedom and by rights, each of which has some inner unresolvable problems, and each of which confronts the others as its outer anti-theses. By means of the Kantian Antinomies it is recognized that such a contrast arises due to the indifference between capital goods and consumption goods