英文摘要 |
Literary criticism theories rose earlier than eight-legged essay did. However, in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, they usually converged and were mutually integrated or even transformed into one concept, which was actually a huge misunderstanding in academia. This study took the literary criticisms in the book “Yimen Dushuji” by a well-known literary critic, I-Men Ho, in the early Qing Dynasty for example to investigate multiple dimensions of eight-legged essay and literary criticism theories. This study found that the writing methods of eight -legged essay had rooted in the thoughts and spirituality of literati, and the criticisms and instructions of eight - legged essay were too formal and simplified. Eight -legged essays are not writings of “literary works,” and the criticisms of eight -legged essays certainly were not correct literary theories, either. However, since literary criticism theories and literary criticisms of eight-legged essay were confused as one concept, they certainly were not recognized as orthodox ancient literary theories, which is the fundamental reason why literary criticism theories have been misunderstood for a long period of time. The true solution to the misunderstanding about literary criticism theories is to actually analyze the writing methods and observe the differences and similariti es between writing methods of eight-legged essay and literary criticism theories, as well as to analyze the ancient literary theories on which literary criticism theories were based, evaluation criteria, and actual operation of methodology and terminology and compare them with the criticism methods of eight -legged essay. In this way, the true appearance of literary criticism theories can be uncovered. |