英文摘要 |
Clahsen and Felser (2006) proposed that second language (L2) processing lacks syntactic details and relies more on semantic and pragmatic information instead. To investigate whether grammatical knowledge underlies L2 on-line processing, and to address the potential issue that evidence of avoiding gap-positing in islands can be discarded based on an alternative interpretation that islands are simply bottlenecks for processing, the present study, based on Wagers and Phillips (2009), investigates L2 gap-positing in sentences with multiple gap positions, and examines whether gap-filling is grammatically-guided in a new domain: Chinese topicalization. The results of a self-paced reading study suggested that similar to native speakers, English-speaking learners of Chinese tend to only resolve filler-gap dependencies in grammatically required positions, providing evidence that L2 processing is grammar-driven. |