中文摘要 |
Partial pressure of oxygen (pO_2) and oxygen saturation (sO_2) are parameters evaluating adequacy of oxygenation. While pO_2 can be directly measured, the sO_2 is usually yielded by calculation. Although inaccuracy of calculated sO_2 has been revealed, the mechanisms accounting for the inaccuracy of calculated sO_2 remains unexplored. 238 samples were analyzed simultaneously using Nova CCX and Siemens RP500 analyzers. The calculated sO_2 are compared to those measured by cooximeters, and the potential factors impairing the accuracy of calculated sO_2 are evaluated. The calculated sO_2 by Nova analyzer significantly differed from reference sO_2 by 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.67~3.12) per 10% decrease of reference sO_2, while calculated sO_2 by Siemens analyzer was comparable to reference sO_2. The inaccuracy of calculated sO_2 by Nova analyzer can be corrected using pO_2 by Siemens analyzer for sO_2 calculation. The differences of pO_2 measurements by both analyzers reached 29.35±7.27 mmHg (95% CI, 27.79~30.91) or around 10% for samples with pO_2 less than 40 mmHg (n=87). The inaccuracy of pO_2 measurements is the main factor contributing to inaccuracy of calculated sO_2. Evaluating the accuracy of pO_2 measurement using venous blood samples is highly recommended, particularly for medical laboratories providing results of venous blood gas analyses. |