月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
生物醫學暨檢驗科學雜誌 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
The Measurement of Oxygen Partial Pressure Determines the Accuracy of Calculated Oxygen Saturation by Blood Gas Analyzers
並列篇名
氧分壓的量測結果決定血氧飽和度計算值的準確性
作者 蔡宸豪簡慈儀卓信慶郭芷瑄顏小妮李雅芬高秀娥柳淑美鐘桂彬
中文摘要
Partial pressure of oxygen (pO_2) and oxygen saturation (sO_2) are parameters evaluating adequacy of oxygenation. While pO_2 can be directly measured, the sO_2 is usually yielded by calculation. Although inaccuracy of calculated sO_2 has been revealed, the mechanisms accounting for the inaccuracy of calculated sO_2 remains unexplored. 238 samples were analyzed simultaneously using Nova CCX and Siemens RP500 analyzers. The calculated sO_2 are compared to those measured by cooximeters, and the potential factors impairing the accuracy of calculated sO_2 are evaluated. The calculated sO_2 by Nova analyzer significantly differed from reference sO_2 by 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.67~3.12) per 10% decrease of reference sO_2, while calculated sO_2 by Siemens analyzer was comparable to reference sO_2. The inaccuracy of calculated sO_2 by Nova analyzer can be corrected using pO_2 by Siemens analyzer for sO_2 calculation. The differences of pO_2 measurements by both analyzers reached 29.35±7.27 mmHg (95% CI, 27.79~30.91) or around 10% for samples with pO_2 less than 40 mmHg (n=87). The inaccuracy of pO_2 measurements is the main factor contributing to inaccuracy of calculated sO_2. Evaluating the accuracy of pO_2 measurement using venous blood samples is highly recommended, particularly for medical laboratories providing results of venous blood gas analyses.
英文摘要
氧分壓(pO_2)與血氧飽和度(sO_2)用於評估血液是否有充足的氧合狀態。氧分壓可直接被量測,而血氧飽和度通常是經由公式計算而得。儘管先前研究指出血氧飽和度計算值並不準確,但是造成血氧飽和度計算值偏差的機制並未被探討。我們利用Nova Stat Profile Critical Care Xpress(以下簡稱Nova分析儀)和Siemens Rapid Point 500(以下簡稱Siemens分析儀)血液氣體分析儀分析238支檢體,將得到的血氧飽和度計算值與血氧計(cooximeter)量測的結果進行比較,藉此探討造成血氧飽和度計算值偏差的可能原因。實驗結果發現每當血氧飽和度實測值減少10%,Nova分析儀的血氧飽和度計算值會偏離實測值2.9(95%信賴區間為2.76~3.12),然而,Siemens分析儀的血氧飽和度計算值與實測值卻不會有明顯的差異。我們進一步發現,當Nova分析儀的氧分壓被替換成Siemens的氧分壓時,Nova分析儀的血氧飽和度計算值的偏差會被修正。另外,兩台分析儀的氧分壓差異可達到29.35±7.27 mmHg(95%信賴區間為27.79~30.91),而且當氧分壓低於40 mmHg時,兩台儀器的氧分壓差異會達到10%。氧分壓量測的偏差是造成血氧飽和度計算值偏差的主因,因此本篇研究建議在量測靜脈血的氧分壓時,必須評估量測結果的準確性,尤其是提供靜脈血檢驗分析報告的實驗室。
起訖頁 32-44
關鍵詞 重症照護血液氣體分析儀氧合靜脈血critical careblood gas analyzersoxygenationvenous blood
刊名 生物醫學暨檢驗科學雜誌  
期數 202003 (32:1期)
出版單位 台灣醫事檢驗學會
該期刊-上一篇 發展高敏感度之競爭性等位基因特異性PCR檢驗方法以輔助診斷甲狀腺乳突癌
該期刊-下一篇 副流行性感冒嗜血桿菌(Haemophilus parainfluenzae)與感染性關節炎
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄