景觀美質評估法與比較判斷法之比較研究

The Study of Comparisions Between Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) and the Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ)

本研究的主要目的即在探討景觀美質評估法（Scenic Beauty Estimation，簡稱SBE）與比較判斷法（Law of Comparative Judgment，簡稱LCJ）兩者之理論基礎與評估結果的相關性，作為規劃經營者進行景觀評估時之參考。本研究以隨機抽樣的景觀照片，分別對大學生與一般遊客作測試，並調查其社經背景。調查資料以t檢定、Kruskal-Wallis單因子異數分析與相關性分析等統計技術加以分析。研究結果顯示：（1）.使用LCI測試時，學生與遊客的評估結果極為相似（r=0.9704），SBE的測試結果較不一致（r=0.6223）；（2）.SBE與LCJ評估結果的趨同性，對學生樣本而言較高（r=0.9715 ），對一般遊客則較低（r=0.5224 ），但兩者並不構成顯著差異。

The purpose of this study was to understand the theories of scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) and Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ) and to compare the relativities of the assessed results between the two methods. The questionnaire was used to ask students and visitors about their landscape preferences on six pictures randomly selectd and their socioeconomic background. Data was analyzed by t-test, Kruskal-Wallis one way ANOVA, and correlation analysis. Two major conclusions were drown from the study results: (1) Comparing the estimation between students and visitors, we found that the result generated from LCJ method (r=0.9704) was more consentaneoous than SBE method (r=0.6223). (2) The difference of convergence in SBE and LCJ method was nonsignificant between students (r=0.9715) and visitors (r=0.5224).