月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
國立中正大學法學集刊 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
德國刑事訴訟上使用衛星定位技術進行監察之研究
並列篇名
A Research on the Use of Satellite Positioning Technology for the Criminal Proceedings Purpose in Germany
作者 吳俊毅
中文摘要
從個人的習慣事實可以推論他的個性,藉此來掌握他的喜好。在刑事訴追上,這樣的方法留下了有用的線索,從最早的足跡到現在的IP、手機位置資訊。「凡走過必留下痕跡」,「追蹤」的想法一直沒變,且方法不斷地在進化。衛星定位技術,像是GPS,在日常生活中,使用者利用這樣的技術作為帶路的工具,是為了解決他「有效率地到達特定地方」的需要,也是一種現代生活的習慣。按照技術原理的被動性,這件事情應該只有使用者自己知道,不過,「這件事情被分享出去」描述的就是「追蹤」,透過機器的位置可以用來推論使用者的所在,並且因此掌握他的下落,資料累積多了或者搭配使用其他的調查措施,可以確定待查明的事實。這樣的想法,在德國,為了達到刑事訴訟的目的也被想到了。從1999年杜賽多夫邦最高法院的一則刑事判決開始,歷經所有的德國法院程序後進到歐洲人權法院,跑了完整的審查機制,隨著技術的進步,不只是原先的爭執部分,也因為與通信功能的匯流整合擴大了新的討論區塊。在科技匯流的趨勢背景下對衛星定位技術深入的討論,確定了衛星定位技術用於刑事訴追目的的正當性。本文想對這個案件所引發的德國立法發展作一個體系性的介紹,希望藉此提供我們在思考此問題時具有啟發性的切入角度與思考步驟。
英文摘要
It is said that an Individual's personality can be deduced from his or her habitual facts which in turn can lead to revelations of one's own preferences. In criminal proceedings, such method leaves a useful trace. From the earliest footprint to contemporary IP address, and mobile phone location data, the idea of "tracking" has not changed and has been constantly evolving. In daily life, individuals use positioning technology, such as GPS as a tool to find a way to meet one's needs of "arriving in a specific place efficiently". Because of passive nature of this type of technology, users of this technological tool are said to be the only knowers. However, it can be argued that the notion of "the thing is being shared" can be considered as "tracking" as the positioning of the equipment can reveal users' locations and determine their whereabouts. With the accumulation of such information or the use of other investigative measures, we can therefore determine matters that we would like to discover. In Germany, the above-mentioned idea has also been noted in order to achieve the purpose of criminal proceedings. From the procedures of the German courts to the European Court of Human Rights, the review mechanism was completed. With the advancement of technology, the original part of the dispute plus the integration of information communication, discussion in this field has been expended. Through the background of this trend of technology, integration in the satellite positioning technology has been greatly examined to ensure the legitimacy of satellite positioning technology for criminal prosecution purposes. This article will systematically introduce the development of German legislation regarding this case with the hopes of providing more cutting-edge thought processes and inspiring insights when considering this issue.
起訖頁 29-75
關鍵詞 衛星定位GPS秘密資訊蒐集措施證據禁止Satellite PositioningGPSIntelligence Gathering MeasuresProhibition of Evidence
刊名 國立中正大學法學集刊  
期數 201904 (63期)
出版單位 國立中正大學法律學系
該期刊-上一篇 不安全軟體製造人的契約外責任──德國與歐洲軟體責任法問題
該期刊-下一篇 不真正連帶債務與連帶債務之界限
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄