中古同名地記輯佚中存在的問題──以《湘中記》為例

The research on the Compilation of chorographies with the same name during the medieval China:a case study of Xiang Zhong Ji

中古時期大量湧現的地記中存在多種同名著述，在輯佚時必須考慮史籍中所引未署撰者的地記內容之歸屬。這一問題迄未引起研究者的重視，本文以《湘中記》為例討論這一問題。其中的關鍵在是否有其他人所撰寫的《湘中記》。本文考證：所謂庾仲雍、甄烈、郭仲產的「湘中記」並不存在。北宋《崇文總目》在三卷本羅含《湘中山水記》外始出一不知撰者的一卷本《湘中記》，這可能是《直齋書錄解題》中提及的唐代張謂《湘中記》。因此，唐之前諸書所引《湘中記》皆屬羅含之書，宋代文獻所引未署作者的《湘中記》條文要根據其記載的內容特徵及地域範圍加以辨別。此外，傳世文獻中所引《湘川記》條文大部分乃他人所撰《湘州記》，不當輯入羅書。最後，本文還對諸家輯佚本的得失有所分析，指出了其中的誤輯。 Because many chorographies with the same name were written during the medieval China, We must consider the attribution of some unidentified parts quoted in literatures. The paper was a case study of Xiang Zhong Ji about this question. Besides some mistakes and omission, the most important difference among the previous researches on the compilation of Luo han's Xiang Zhong Ji was whether some parts of Xiang Zhong Ji quoted in literatures should be seen as Luo han's. It was related to the suppose that other authors had also written a book named Xiang Zhong Ji . My research found that these authors such as Yong zhongyong, Zhenlie and Guo zhongchan didn't write a book named Xiang Zhong Ji . However, Zhangwei of the Tang dynasty might write a book named Xiang Zhong Ji . So, Xiang Zhong Ji which quoted in literatures before Tang dynasty should be compiled in Luo han's Xiang Zhong Ji ,but which quoted in literatures in Song dynasty should be compiled according to its content and spatial information. Furthermore, some parts of Xiang Chuan Ji were seen as Luo han's Xiang Zhong Ji by mistakes. Besides, I found some other mistakes in previous researches on the compilation of Luo han's Xiang Zhong Ji.