城鎮風貌型塑整體計畫之可評估性衡量及執行評估

An Evaluability Assessment and Implementation Evaluation of the Rural Landscape Reformation Comprehensive Project

本研究針對城鎮風貌型塑整體計畫進行可評估性衡量與執行評估，主要是因為該計畫在當時正面臨轉型，引入了跨域整合及財務自償率等新元素，導致執行進度落後。本文使用次級資料分析、深度訪談、與焦點團體座談法來探討其在政策設計與執行上可能存在的問題。研究結果包含了該計畫的邏輯模型，描繪該計畫之重要組成元素與彼此的因果關係，並發掘了一些具體的問題，例如中央政府與地方政府的跨域整合平台運作不佳，及縣市的環境景觀總顧問在跨領域規劃與財務自償性上的專業與量能有待加強等。此外，本研究也評估該計畫的影響理論，研究結果顯示該計畫的短期目標尚稱合理，惟地方政府執行計畫時程過短，影響計畫品質；中長期目標則很難達成，因為該計畫涵蓋的面向與規模不足，很難達成預期目標。綜合上述，可評估性衡量有助於檢視計畫從投入、活動、產出、到目標間的因果關係是否合理，然後可以提出政策建議以改善計畫，因此值得國內實務界與學術界採用。 This study conducted an evaluability assessment and implementation evaluation of the ‘Rural Landscape Reformation Comprehensive Project” in Taiwan, mainly because the project was behind schedule, had undergone a transformation period, and had introduced new elements, such as cross-border integration and financial self-liquidation at that time. This paper aims to explore possible problems in policy design and implementation through secondary data analysis, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. The results include the logic model of the project, which shows the important components of the project and describes the causal relationships between them. The results also reveal some problems, such as the poor operation of the cross-border integration platform of the central government and local governments. In addition, the environmental landscape consultants of the county and city did not have the capacity to deal effectively with the planning of cross-border integration and financial self-liquidation. This study also evaluates the impact theory of the project. The results show that the short-term goals could have been achieved reasonably by the project. However, the time period of local governments' implementation was too short. So the quality of the project outputs decreased. The medium- and long-term goals were not expected to be achieved because the scope and scale of the plan were insufficient. In sum, evaluability assessment can be used to examine whether the causal relationships between the project's input, activities, output, and goals are reasonable, and then can provide policy recommendations to improve the project. As a result, it is recommended that practitioners and scholars use evaluability assessment in Taiwan.