性侵未成年人案件證明疑難問題研究——兼論我國刑事證明模式從印證到多元“求真”的制度轉型

Resolving the Problem of Proving Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Transition from the Corroboration Mode to the Multifold Criminal Proof Mode

性侵未成年人犯罪案件常呈現以被害人陳述為主要證據的特殊證據構造，在被告人拒絕作出有罪供述的情形，適用我國嚴格的印證證明模式容易導致案件追訴的失敗。性侵未成年人犯罪的案件特徵引起的證明難題具有普遍性。借鑒英美法系國家的證明方法，在性侵未成年人犯罪中，應建立“被害人陳述可信性”的證據審查標準，完善被害人陳述的取得與審查的程序機制以防範錯案的發生。應當以特殊類型犯罪中刑事證明疑難問題的解決為契機，推動我國刑事證明制度從單一的“印證”模式逐步向印證為主體的多元“求真”路徑轉型。 In child sexual abuse cases, the main evidence is often the child victim's testimony. When applying the corroboration mode of our criminal evidence law, the absence of the defendant's confession would easily lead to the failure of the prosecution. The difficulty in proving the fact in child sexual abuse case is a world-wide problem. By learning from the common law countries’ proof path, it is advisable to establish the ''trustworthiness standard'' of victim's testimony in child sexual abuse cases, and improve the procedural rules of obtaining and examining the victim's testimony to prevent wrongful convictions. By solving this proof problem of this special type of crime, it is argued that we should take the opportunity to promote the transition from the corroboration mode to the multifold criminal proof mode.