重裁事由的問題與主義－－基於域外經驗與本土實踐的考察

Grounds for Remission of Arbitral A wards: Diverse Approaches and Chinese Practice

重裁事由是重新仲裁制度的核心問題，辨清重新仲裁的本質、理清重裁與撤裁的程序邏輯、勘定其與相關制度的功能界限均是科學規劃具體事由的必要前提。只有認同重裁是既判力原則例外的本質步才能避免重裁事由的恣意擴張；只有考察不同重裁程序的特徵，才能確保重裁事由的程序邏輯；只有注意重裁與相關制度的分工合作，才能避免事由的混淆與衝突。上述理念的缺乏和實踐中法外程序的盛行阻礙了我國重裁事由的精細化發展。

The issue of grounds for remission is the primacy of remission system. Discerning the very nature of remission, searching for the link between remission proceedings and setting aside proceedings, distinguishing the functions of remission from those of other remedies are the necessary prerequisites of determining grounds for remission. Only by recognizing that remission is an exception to the principle of Res Judicata can grounds for remission be limited. Only by reviewing the diverse remission proceedings can grounds for remission be suitable to them. Only by differentiating the functions of remission from those of other recourses can an amalgamation of grounds for remission and grounds for other relevant measures be avoided. The absence of conceptions mentioned above and special procedure in China impede the development of grounds for remission in a detailed way.