反恐行政認定行為的不可訴性商榷

中華人民共和國反恐怖主義法》將國家反恐怖主義工作領導機構做出的反恐行政認定行為規定為不可訴行為的做法值得商榷。從行為性質來分析，反恐行政認定行為不屬于國家行為，也不符合終局行政裁決行為的法律特徵，而是一種影響被認定的恐怖活動組織和人員的權利或義務的行政確認行為，理應具有可訴性。將反恐行政認定行為規定為不可訴行為與諸多域外奉行反恐行政認定模式國家的立（司）法例相背，也不符合該項制度的現實與未來發展趨勢之所需。立法者應當適時修改《反恐怖主義法》相關條款，將反恐行政認定行為納入司法審查範圍，作為可訴行為來對待。

The Anti-terrorism Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation made by the anti- terrorist agencies is non- justiciable. However, the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation is neither a state action nor a final administrative adjudication. In fact, the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation is a administrative action that can influence the rights and obligations of the recognized terrorist organizations and personnel and it should be justiciable. The Chinese law that defines the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation as non-justiciable is different from many countries around the world and it does not conform to the reality and the future development of this system. Therefore it should be revised and the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation shall be brought under judicial review.