英文摘要 |
Phlebotomy is one of the common medical treatments. However, the procedure may be associated with adverse complications. A major clinical concern is the abnormal laboratory values received due to inappropriate phlebotomy, which may mislead the clinicians to make wrongful treatment decisions. Therefore, executing an accurate phlebotomy procedure is a very important issue in regards to improving patient safety and quality of medical treatments. The rate of correct phlebotomy preformed in January of 2012 was 76.9%. All the incorrect phlebotomy identified based on our checklist revealed that over 70% of the inappropriately performed items included the following: wrongful information of the patient sticker, mismatch of inspection sheet, absence of sticker on the test tube, and the lack of blood specimen. As a result, a project committee was established with the objectives to search for solutions and to implement methods with the goal to prevent negligence associated with incorrect phlebotomy. A four-aspect solution was carried out. The first was to obtain a double check system on patient identity by using a computer-aid system (Personal Digital Assistant, PDA) to read the patient's wristband and laboratory inspection sheet prior to conducting phlebotomy. Once the identification code from both sources matched, the nurse could then print out the number of ID labels and stick them onto the test tubes for the specimens. The second was to strengthen the knowledge of correct phlebotomy by educating and training the nursing personnel, which included the re-emphasis on the importance of correct phlebotomy and the implementation of hands-on skills necessary for operating the PDA. The third was to assign a special clinical training instructor among our senior nursing staff, whose role was specifically focused on overseeing the new personnel so that the implementation and execution of correct phlebotomy could be unified. The last was to set up an auditing system by assigning project specialists to monitor the process of phlebotomy performed by nursing personnel. The surveillance items included the number of phlebotomy, the number of rejected cases, and the reason for rejection, all of which were then checked monthly by the head nurse. After implementation of the four-aspect solution, the rate of correct phlebotomy performed achieved 97.9% by December of 2012, a correction rate of improvement nearly 21% with the number of erroneous items reduced to only two events (9.6%). By enhancing the rate of correct phlebotomy performed, this project successfully achieved our initial intent to provide the medical team accurate and reliable test values, thereby improving patient safety and refining quality of medical treatments. |