中文摘要 |
近年兩岸四地的公民社會持續振動。當中,對於2014年分別發生在台灣、香港和澳門的大型社會運動,已有研究透過比較或概念性的分析,嘗試探討其背後的共同成因與差異性。卻鮮少有研究從微觀層次探討台港澳三地社會抗爭的互動過程。透過以發生在2014年澳門的「反離補運動」的動員過程與後續影響作為研究個案,本文認為是運動組織者靈活地運用來自香港媒體與台灣的相關抗爭論述作為資源,重新構框出適合在地脈絡的動員論述,從而成功地促進了在封閉的政治結構與貧乏的動員渠道下的動員能力,造就這場澳門回歸後最大型的社會運動。這一動員機制在後續的抗爭事件中亦同樣出現,並有進一步發展的可能性。
The civil society of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao has been vibrant in recent years. Many researchers aim to identify this phenomenon via comparative and conceptual approaches, especially concentrating on the unexpected social movements that occurred during 2014 in these three respective places. However, few studies attempt to examine the interactive processes of such movements. To fill the gap, this article draws on the Anti-Welfare Package Movement in Macao in 2014 as a case study to demonstrate how movement organizers flexibly and successfully framed the mobilizing discourses by using various articles from Hong Kong media and The Sunflower Movement in Taiwan; thereby, enhancing the mobilization within an unfavorable political structure and media environment. This initiative process seems to become a mechanism for playing a role in subsequent protests. |