不同遊憩機會步道可接受限度指標因子建立之研究──以藤枝森林遊樂區為例

Designing LAC Indicators of Different Recreation Opportunity Trails － A Case Study of Teng-Zhi Forest Recreation Area

本研究以藤枝森林遊樂區作為實證的地點，蒐集區內5條步道之基本質料，利用遊憩機會序列分類方式將其分類後，並利用可接受改變限度之精神，以問卷調查遊客心中對步道的情境屬性偏好及其可接受限度。研究結果顯示：1.不同類型之步道上，遊客對步道情境屬性之重視順序相同，依序為自然、及人文資源、步道特色、步道設施物、經營管理屬性，且對各情境屬性所重視之變數順序相同。2.不同類型步道情境屬性之可接受限度僅在鋪面材質、步道寬度、醫療設施、維護環境清潔、提供解說服務出現差異。3.遊客之個人特性、遊憩動機會影響其對步道環境屬性的偏好及可接受限度，個人特性包括性別、年齡、職業、教育程度等社經因子。 The Teng-Zhi Forest Recreation Area was chosen for empirical study. After collecting base data of five trails, classifying by Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS), and utilizing the spirits of The Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC), it was used by questionnaire to look into the visitors' preferred trail setting attributes as well as their acceptable limits. The results lead to: (a) No matter what setting attributes of trail types are, the results visitors considered are the same, ranked as nature circumtances, trail characteristics, trail facilities, and management features. The setting variate consequences visitors thought arc the same. (b) Among different trail types, the visitors' acceptable setting attributes have divergences in material, width, medical treatment, clear environment, and interpretative service. (c) The visitors' personalities and recreation motivation will affect their preferred setting attributes of trails and acceptable limits. The personalities in this research include sexes, ages, occupations, and education degrees.

The Teng-Zhi Forest Recreation Area was chosen for empirical study. After collecting base data of five trails, classifying by Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS), and utilizing the spirits of The Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC), it was used by questionnaire to look into the visitors' preferred trail setting attributes as well as their acceptable limits. The results lead to: (a) No matter what setting attributes of trail types are, the results visitors considered are the same, ranked as nature circumtances, trail characteristics, trail facilities, and management features. The setting variate consequences visitors thought arc the same. (b) Among different trail types, the visitors' acceptable setting attributes have divergences in material, width, medical treatment, clear environment, and interpretative service. (c) The visitors' personalities and recreation motivation will affect their preferred setting attributes of trails and acceptable limits. The personalities in this research include sexes, ages, occupations, and education degrees.