我國民法典編纂背景下智慧財產權立法模式之選擇－－以再法典化立法趨勢為視角

The Choice of Legislative Mode of Intellectual Property Law in the Background of the Chinese Civil Code: From the Perspective of Re-codification

《法國民法典》、《德國民法典》採民商分立體例，與我國為民商合一體例不同，故我國無須依循其制。再法典化是當今世界各國立法趨勢，智慧財產權之私權性質為TRIPs所確認，民法典系私權根本大法，自無將智慧財產權排除其外之理。智慧財產權與物權同為財產權體系重要組成部分，如將智慧財產權編排除於民法典之外，將造成民法典之不完備。物權與智慧財產權相同，依靠許多公法性質之法律來輔助，不能因此認為智慧財產權不宜於民法典中獨立成編。民法典中將智慧財產權獨立成編，設置“通則”，規定智慧財產權法一般性規定，同時設置專節對專利權、商標、著作權等智慧財產權加以規定，將程序性、公法性具體規範交由其他法規進行規定。我國民法典應吸收嶄新之時代產物，將智慧財產權獨立成編，完善整個財產法體系，建立充滿強大新生命之中國民法典。

Combination of Civil and Commercial Law is China's traditional legislative mode, which is different from the French Civil Code and German Civil Code. Re-codification is the trend of legislation in the world. Civil Code is the fundamental law of private right, thus intellectual property right should not be excluded from Civil Code for it has been confirmed as private right by TRIPs and an important part of the property right with real right. lntellectual property law needs relative public law provisions and procedure provisions law just like Real Right Law, but it doesn't prevent intellectual property law from being an independent section of Civil Code. lnclude intellectual property law as a separation section of the civil code, setting the General Principal Section for the general stipulations and special section for patent right, trademark right and copyright, with public and procedural norms by other laws and regulations. To establish a civil code with powerful new life, our civil code should take intellectual property law as an independent part, absorbing new product of the times, perfecting the system of property law system.