回歸法律文本：第三人撤銷之訴原告適格再解釋

Return to Legal Text: Reinterpret on Qualified Plaintiff of the Third-party Opposition Procedure

法律解釋須以法律文本的文義為中心，文義解釋是法律解釋的起點，也是終點，在各種解釋方法中居於優先次序。按照《民事訴訟法》第56條的規定，第三人撤銷之訴的原告範圍，限於“前兩款規定的第三人”，即有獨立請求權第三人和無獨立請求權第三人。第三人撤銷之訴原告適格的解釋，須從“第三人”的文義解釋入手，綜合運用體系解釋和擴張解釋等解釋方法，得出妥當的解釋結論，必要時應認可受詐害人提起撤銷之訴的原告資格。

Legal interpretation shall be based on context of legal texts, and literal interpretation not only is the starting point of legal interpretation, but also is the end of legal interpretation, which is takes the premier place in various interpretation methods. According to the Article 56 of 'Civil Procedure Law', plaintiff range of the third-party opposition procedure should be limited to 'the third party stipulated in the preceding two paragraphs', namely the third-party with independent claim and the third-party without independent claim. When interpret qualified plaintiff of the third- party opposition procedure, we must start from literal interpretation, together with system interpretation and expansion interpretation, and so on, to drawing appropriate conclusions about 'the third party'. If necessary, we can also approve victim's plaintiff qualification who harmed by fraud litigation.