|
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。 【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】
|
篇名 |
獨特視角下的章學誠研究――《章學誠研究述評(1920-1985)》之述評
|
並列篇名 |
The Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng by Unique Perspective- The Review of The Review of the Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng(1920-1985) |
作者 |
賈慶軍 |
中文摘要 |
黃兆強教授的新著《章學誠研究述評(1920-1985)》是章學誠研究的又一力作。本文在評述該著的同時,也提出了自己的觀點。筆者發現,實齋「六經皆史」論是建立在其道論基礎上的,而實齋的道論有三個層次:第一層次的道乃萬物之所以然之「道」;第二層的道即周公之治道;第三層之道乃是載入典籍中的道。實齋之道論最後停留在第二層,這使其更接近朱子而不是陽明。 |
英文摘要 |
Professor Huang Zhao-qiang’s new work of The Review of theStudy of Zhang Xue-Cheng(1920-1985) is the masterpiece about thestudy of Zhang xue-cheng. The author also put forward his own point of view while reviewing Professor Huang Zhao-qiang’s new work. Theauthor found that Zhang xue-cheng’s theory that six Confucian classics were all historical works was based on his theory of Dao. Histheory of Dao contained three levels:the Dao which produced everything; the Dao which Zhou Gong managing things;the Dao which recorded in the classics. Zhang xue-cheng preferenced the Dao of thesecond level. Zhang xue-cheng was the successor of Zhu xi but not ofWang yang-ming. |
起訖頁 |
283-337 |
關鍵詞 |
章學誠、六經皆史、王陽明、Zhang xue-cheng、Dao、Six Confucian Classics are all Historical Works、Wang yang-ming |
刊名 |
當代儒學研究 |
期數 |
201612 (21期) |
出版單位 |
國立中央大學儒學研究中心
|
該期刊-上一篇 |
歐西漢學者羅亞娜(Jana S. Rošker)宋明清儒知識論研究:化西宗「三款六式」框架之回應 |
|