從愛、慾、知識迷宮到陰語的謎域：孟若小說〈出走〉與拉岡《第二十講座》的雙向閱讀／分析

A Two-Way Reading/Analysis of Munro’s “Runaway” and Lacan’s Seminar XX

晚期孟若小說〈出走〉和晚期拉岡《第二十講座》（以及《電視》），兩者都深入潛探展開於上世紀中葉以後，至今方興未艾的兩大解放運動──第二波婦女運動與青年反叛運動──以及與此兩者相關的知識／關係／倫理，並出之以陰語模式的表達，呈現文字與絕爽兩者的結合，因而對端賴語言和理知的傳統解讀造成基進的挑戰。加之牽引著讀者自身的難題，而引發一種強迫性重複閱讀。這兩套著作（以及讀者）面對的難題，一方面關係著兩大解放運動──加之消費資本主義──所引發的反壓抑理想主義與威權弱化對分離之作用與主體性之形塑造成的嚴峻挑戰。另一方面，（陽性）主體性及其自戀式愛情也變得窘態百出。本論文藉著孟若與拉岡的雙向閱讀／分析，讓這兩個困難的文本發揮兩經互解的作用，而爬梳出其陰語邏輯：唯有大大降低自我對於無意識與客體的掌控，轉而從體制的內裡邁向知識與關係之真實無意識（陰性無意識）謎域，才有以臻至「真實」的解放與非自戀式愛情。

Alice Munro’s “long” short story “Runaway” and Lacan’s Seminar XX(and Television) both delve into the two great liberation movements thatbegan in the latter half of the last century and are now still underway—theyouth movement and the feminist movement—as well as the discourses onknowledge and human relations these movements give rise to. These textsgive expression to these authors’ observations and responses in the form ofwhat Lacan calls “lalangue,” a mixture of language and affect, which relates tofeminine jouissance and which thus poses a radical challenge to language andlogocentrism. In addition, the reader’s own predicament consequent upon thetwo liberation movements adds to the difficulty.The predicament is a twofold one. On the one hand, there is the dauntingchallenge to separation and the formation of subjectivity subsequent to theanti-repressive idealism and the weakening of authority brought about by thetwo movements, plus consumer capitalism. On the other, (phallic) subjectivity,along with its narcissistic love, is becoming invalid.By resorting to a two-way reading/analysis of Munro’s “Runaway” andLacan’s Seminar XX, the present article attempts to tackle the compulsivelyrepetitive reading entailed by these two difficult texts. This attempt leads tolalangue’s enigmatic vision: it is only by toning down the dominant discourseprescribing the ego’s domination over the unconscious and the object, viathe encounter between subjects with their respective enigmatic unconscious