英文摘要 |
This paper investigates the principles of (gender) equality and antidiscrimination as established by the United Nations and adopted on most national levels. While the equality principles were established internationally, the political and legal background of China changed. This paper does not discuss the Chinese city states of Hong Kong and Singapore, both deeply influenced by British law and centuries of colonial rule. The paper argues that such traditional legal customs influence equality practices in China today. This paper studies the legal scheme of both Chinese and Taiwanese law concerning gender equality, and observes that though China and Taiwan differ in their gender-related legislation and policies, social reality shows numerous similarities, and court rulings do not always support the law; and are difficult to implement in self-governing villages. This status of women as merchandise may be responsible for the acts of violence against women that are prevalent both in China and Taiwan, both within and outside the family. In conclusion, though Taiwan has tried very hard to abolish by law the commercial recruitment of brides both in China and throughout SoutheastAsia, one may still wonder if this effort has been due to the worsening ranking of Taiwan in the U.S. Trafficking in Persons report after 2006 (U.S. Department of State 2012), and is due to international pressure rather than resulting from the awareness and acknowledgment that trafficking of women is morally wrong and inacceptable in a human rights perspective. The paper points out the need to discuss generally, from a feminist perspective, and in detail dealing with the variety of women' issues, the role that law can play for social change in traditionally Chinese societies. |